Boeck v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana
Brandon Boeck |
Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana |
4:2023cv01950 |
May 26, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1446 Breach of Contract- Insurance |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Brandon Boeck, filed.(Dick, Eric) |
Filing 6 ORDER granting #5 Motion to Abate Pending Completion of Appraisal. It is THEREFORE, ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that this case is abated pending completion of the appraisal process for a period of one hundred-twenty (120) days or until such time as Plaintiff and Defendant advise the Court that the appraisal has been completed. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (bthomas, 4) |
Filing 5 Agreed MOTION to Abate by Brandon Boeck, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/29/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order AGREED ORDER TO ABATE)(Dick, Eric) |
Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for First-Party Insurance Property Damage Cases Arising from Disasters. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(bthomas, 4) |
The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/11/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-29979283) filed by Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit 1, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6)(Kressenberg, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Boeck v. Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Brandon Boeck | |
Represented By: | Eric B. Dick |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Safeco Insurance Company of Indiana | |
Represented By: | John Mark Kressenberg |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.