ProudLion IP, LLC v. Movado Group, LP
Plaintiff: ProudLion IP, LLC
Defendant: Movado Group, LP
Case Number: 4:2023cv02052
Filed: June 5, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Andrew S Hanen
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 28, 2023 Filing 15 REPLY in Support of #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM , filed by Movado Group, Inc.. (Wyatt, Lance)
July 20, 2023 Filing 14 RESPONSE to #10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM filed by ProudLion IP, LLC. (Ramey, William)
July 18, 2023 Filing 13 ANSWER to #11 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim with Jury Demand by ProudLion IP, LLC, filed.(Ramey, William)
June 29, 2023 Filing 12 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Movado Group, LP, filed.(Wyatt, Lance)
June 29, 2023 Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against ProudLion IP, LLC by Movado Group, LP, filed.(Wyatt, Lance)
June 29, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM by Movado Group, LP, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wyatt, Lance)
June 29, 2023 Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Neil J. McNabnay on behalf of Movado Group, LP, filed. (McNabnay, Neil)
June 9, 2023 Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Movado Group, LP served on 6/8/2023, answer due 6/29/2023, filed.(Ramey, William)
June 6, 2023 Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Movado Group, LP. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4)
June 6, 2023 Filing 6 US Patent and Trademark Office Notified. AO 120, filed. (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (RebeccaBecknal, 4)
June 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/11/2023 at 10:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4)
June 5, 2023 Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by ProudLion IP, LLC, filed.(Ramey, William)
June 5, 2023 Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Movado Group, LP, filed.(Ramey, William)
June 5, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE Notice of Report on the Filing of an Action Regarding a Patent (AO-120) by ProudLion IP, LLC, filed. (Ramey, William)
June 5, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Movado Group, LP (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30020161) filed by ProudLion IP, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Ramey, William)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: ProudLion IP, LLC v. Movado Group, LP
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ProudLion IP, LLC
Represented By: William P Ramey, III
Represented By: Jeffrey E Kubiak
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Movado Group, LP
Represented By: Lance Eric Wyatt, Jr.
Represented By: Neil J McNabnay
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?