Johnson v. Bloom Retirement Holdings Inc.
| Trish Johnson |
| Bloom Retirement Holdings Inc. f/k/a American Advisors Group, Bloom Retirement Holdings Inc. and American Advisors Group |
| 4:2023cv02086 |
| June 7, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Trish Johnson filed by Trish Johnson.(Medearis, David Miller) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Trish Johnson, filed.(Medearis, David Miller) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/5/2023 at 11:10 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(JacquelineMata, 4)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Bloom Retirement Holdings Inc. f/k/a American Advisors Group, filed.(Cox, Sarah) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris District Court, case number 2023-26866 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30033765) filed by Bloom Retirement Holdings Inc. f/k/a American Advisors Group. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cronenwett, Mark) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
