Duferco Steel, LLC v. M/V Great Spirit et al
| Duferco Steel, LLC and Duferco Steel, Inc. |
| M/V GREAT SPIRIT, Sea 59 Leasing Co., Ltd., Norvic Shipping Asia Pte. Ltd. and Wah Kwong Ship Management (HK) Ltd. |
| 4:2023cv02190 |
| June 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Contract: Marine |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1333 Admiralty |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Norvic Shipping Asia Pte. Ltd., Sea 59 Leasing Co., Ltd., Wah Kwong Ship Management (HK) Ltd. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Norvic Shipping Asia Pte. Ltd., Sea 59 Leasing Co., Ltd., Wah Kwong Ship Management (HK) Ltd., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Summons, #2 Exhibit Summons)(O'Neil, William) |
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 9/15/2023 at 10:10 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30069970) filed by Duferco Steel, LLC.(O'Neil, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
