Laccinole v. Nizick et al
| Christopher Laccinole |
| Albert Joseph Nizick, Jr., POSC Pac doing business as Police Officers Support Committee and John Does 1-10 |
| 4:2023cv02272 |
| June 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/15/2023 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(ShannonHolden, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 2 Summons Issued as to Albert Joseph Nizick, Jr, POSC Pac. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff in person at the counter, filed.(ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against John Does 1-10, Albert Joseph Nizick, Jr, POSC Pac filed by Christopher Laccinole. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(ShannonHolden, 4) |
| Confirmation of receipt of payment from Christopher Laccinole in the amount of $ 402.00 re: #1 Complaint. Receipt date: 06/21/2023. Receipt number 400000143. Purpose Description: New case-paid. (ShannonHolden, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
