Zita Tech, Inc v. Mohawk Industries, Inc. et al
| zita tech, inc |
| Mohawk Industries, Inc. and Mohawk Carpet, LLC |
| Zita Tech, Inc, |
| 4:2023cv02317 |
| June 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 ANSWER to #16 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. with Jury Demand by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Ackley, John) |
| Filing 24 STATEMENT Identification of Attorneys and Entities of Defendants Mohawk Industries, Inc and Mohawk Carpet LLC by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed.(Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
| Filing 23 ANSWER to #6 Answer to Complaint, Counterclaim by Zita Tech, Inc,, filed.(Botkin, Ryan) |
| Filing 22 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Zita Tech, Inc,, filed.(Botkin, Ryan) |
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #20 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint and for Plaintiff to Respond to Amended Counterclaims, if any. Plaintiff shall have 21 days to answer or otherwise respond.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
| Filing 20 Joint MOTION for Extension of Time for Defendants to Respond to Plaintiff's Third Amended Complaint and for Plaintiff to Respond to Amended Counterclaims, if any by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 8/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #4 Motion for Peter L. Munk to Appear Pro Hac Vice Note: Instructions to request Texas Southern CM/ECF registration through PACER are found #here.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time; Motion-related deadline set re: #13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Counterclaim. Answer due by 07/28/2023.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
|
Filing 17
SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 11/28/2023. Joinder of Parties due by 10/27/2023. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 05/29/2024. Deft Expert Report due by 06/28/2024. Discovery due by 08/13/2024. Mediation due by 10/29/2024. Dispositive Motion Filing due by 09/12/2024. Non-Dispositive Motion Filing due by 09/12/2024. Joint Pretrial Order due by 12/03/2024. Docket Call set for 01/21/2025 at 1:30 PM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jennellegonzalez) Modified on 7/17/2023 (AmyCooper, 4). (Entered: 07/17/2023)
|
| Filing 16 Third AMENDED COMPLAINT against Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc. filed by Zita Tech, Inc,. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F)(Botkin, Ryan) |
|
Filing 15
Order in Removed Case. Statement due within ten days.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 9/27/2023 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Charles Eskridge(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(jengonzalez, 4)
|
| Filing 13 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Defendants' Counterclaim by Zita Tech, Inc,, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/2/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Buratti, Leah) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Kavid V. Singh on behalf of Zita Tech, Inc,, filed. (Singh, Kavid) |
| Filing 11 STATEMENT of Information in Removed Action by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed.(Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Ryan A. Botkin on behalf of Zita Tech, Inc,, filed. (Botkin, Ryan) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Leah Buratti on behalf of Zita Tech, Inc,, filed. (Buratti, Leah) |
| Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed.(Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
| Filing 7 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Zita Tech, Inc,, filed.(Botkin, Ryan) |
| Filing 6 ANSWER to Complaint with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against Zita Tech, Inc, by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A - Second Amended Petition)(Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by John Ackley on behalf of Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed. (Ackley, John) |
| Filing 4 MOTION for Peter L. Munk to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 7/18/2023. (Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed.(Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal with Jury Demand, COUNTERCLAIM against All Defendants by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit Exhibit C)(Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 151st Judicial District, Harris County, TX, case number 2023-22313 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30109731) filed by Mohawk Carpet, LLC, Mohawk Industries, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit Exhibit 2, #3 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet)(Skagerberg, Kathryn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
