The Pinehollow v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company
| The Pinehollow |
| Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company |
| 4:2023cv02362 |
| June 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Alfred H Bennett. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held on 8/18/2023: Scheduling Order to be entered. Appearances: Patrick Connell McGinnis, Alicia G Curran. (Court Reporter: D. Smith), filed.(JacquelineMata, 4) |
| Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, filed.(Curran, Alicia) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Service of Defendant's Initial Disclosures by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, filed. (Curran, Alicia) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Patrick C. McGinnis on behalf of The Pinehollow, filed. (McGinnis, Patrick) |
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by The Pinehollow, filed.(McGinnis, Patrick) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE Service of Plaintiffs' of Plaintiff's Initial Rule 26(A)(1) Disclosures by The Pinehollow, filed. (McGinnis, Patrick) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #4 MOTION to Reset Initial Conference. Initial Conference set for 8/18/2023 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Alfred H Bennett.(Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(ledwards, 4)
|
| Filing 4 MOTION to Reset Initial Conference by The Pinehollow, filed. Motion Docket Date 7/21/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Wilson, Chad) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 7/21/2023 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(HortenciaLerma, 4)
|
| Filing 2 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company, filed.(Curran, Alicia) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 270TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT, case number 2023-30992 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30127286) filed by Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Civil Cover Sheet)(Curran, Alicia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: The Pinehollow v. Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: The Pinehollow | |
| Represented By: | Chad Troy Wilson |
| Represented By: | Patrick Connell McGinnis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Westchester Surplus Lines Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Alicia G Curran |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
