Athreya v. Texas A&M University
| Sheela Athreya |
| Texas A&M University |
| 4:2023cv02478 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Texas A&M University, filed.(Keeney, Joseph) |
| Filing 10 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Texas A&M University, filed.(Keeney, Joseph) |
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Sheela Athreya, filed.(Walsh, Colin) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Sheela Athreya served on 7/11/2023, answer due 8/1/2023, filed.(Walsh, Colin) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Colin Walsh on behalf of Sheela Athreya, filed. (Walsh, Colin) |
Filing 6
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/1/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4)
|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to Texas A&M University. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JacquelineMata, 4) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Texas A&M University, filed.(Zibari, Harjeen) |
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Texas A&M University. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(HortenciaLerma, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Texas A&M University, filed.(Zibari, Harjeen) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30166897) filed by Sheela Athreya. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Zibari, Harjeen) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Athreya v. Texas A&M University | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sheela Athreya | |
| Represented By: | Harjeen Zibari |
| Represented By: | Colin William Walsh |
| Represented By: | Jairo Nikov Castellanos |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Texas A&M University | |
| Represented By: | Joseph Daniel Keeney |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
