Haggerty v. Landry et al
| Porsha Renee Haggerty |
| Normand Landry and Nishan Transport Inc. |
| 4:2023cv02554 |
| July 12, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Christopher Ngo, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Nguyen, Nhan) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Normand Landry, Nishan Transport Inc., filed.(Best, Brandon) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher Ngo on behalf of Porsha Renee Haggerty, filed. (Nguyen, Nhan) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 10/18/2023 at 10:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrez, 4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Harris County District Court, case number 2022-53136 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30195729) filed by Nishan Transport Inc., Normand Landry. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Index, #2 Exhibit B - Executed Process, #3 Exhibit C - Original Petition & Original Answer, #4 Exhibit D - Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit E - List of Counsel of Record, #6 Exhibit F - Notice of Removal (State Court))(Best, Brandon) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
