Ezenwa v. Shadowens et al
Maxwell C Ezenwa |
Andrew Shadowens, Novitz and Victor |
4:2023cv02610 |
July 17, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT as to Maxwell C Ezenwa. More Definite Statement due by 9/26/2023(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(GabrielleLyons, 4) |
INITIAL PARTIAL Filing fee: $5, receipt number 400001295, filed. (klove, 4) |
Filing 6 ORDER denying as moot #5 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(GabrielleLyons, 4) |
Filing 5 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Maxwell C Ezenwa, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/15/2023. (AaronJackson, 4) |
Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Maxwell C Ezenwa, filed. (RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Maxwell C Ezenwa, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/7/2023. (RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Maxwell C Ezenwa.(RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.