Thomas -El v. Nissan Motor Acceptance Company, LLC et al
| Phinehas W. Thomas-El ex rel doing business as Jerry Wayne Thomas Jr. |
| Nissan Motor Acceptance Company, LLC, Nissan Motor Acceptance Company (NMAC) and Baker Nissan North, Inc. |
| 4:2023cv02676 |
| July 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Anti-Trust |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Master Bill of Lading by Phinehas W. Thomas-El ex rel, filed.(KimberlyPicota, 4) |
| Filing 4 Master Bill of Lading by Phinehas W. Thomas-El ex rel, filed.(KimberlyPicota, 4) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Phinehas Woodley Thomas El, filed.(KimberlyPicota, 4) |
Filing 2
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 9/29/2023 at 11:20 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(AkeitaMichael, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Baker Nissan North, Inc., Nissan Motor Acceptance Company (NMAC), Nissan Motor Acceptance Company, LLC filed by Jerry Wayne Thomas Jr.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(ShannonHolden, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
