Ginn v. PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY LLC
| Patrick Ginn |
| PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY LLC |
| 4:2023cv02830 |
| August 1, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL entered based on the plaintiffs notice of dismissal. Case terminated on 9/1/23.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(LisaEddins, 4)
|
| Filing 11 NOTICE of Dismissal as to Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC by Patrick Ginn, filed. (Alexander, William) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for FLSA.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(leddins, 4)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Filing Consent to Join by Patrick Ginn, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Ellton Pady)(Alexander, William) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC served on 8/3/2023, answer due 8/24/2023, filed.(Alexander, William) |
| Filing 7 Summons Issued as to Patterson-UTI Drilling Company LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(MayraMarquez, 4) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Filing Consents to Join by Patrick Ginn, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Samuel J Carruth, #2 Exhibit Consent of Joseph Morgan)(Alexander, William) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 10/13/2023 at 11:00 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(AaronJackson, 4)
|
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Patrick Ginn, filed.(Alexander, William) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Filing Consents to Join by Patrick Ginn, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Luther Hathcoat, #2 Exhibit Consent of Jeffrey Tedesco)(Alexander, William) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY LLC, filed.(Alexander, William) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY LLC (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30290809) filed by Patrick Ginn. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent of Patrick Ginn, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Alexander, William) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ginn v. PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Patrick Ginn | |
| Represented By: | William Clifton Alexander |
| Represented By: | Austin W. Anderson |
| Represented By: | Carter Tilden Hastings |
| Represented By: | Lauren Elizabeth Braddy |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: PATTERSON-UTI DRILLING COMPANY LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
