Texas Republic Utility, LLC v. Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC
| Texas Republic Utility, LLC |
| Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC |
| 4:2023cv02874 |
| August 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC, filed.(Rinehart, Erin) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Texas Republic Utility, LLC, filed.(Rapp, Megan) |
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (bthomas, 4) |
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/29/2023 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Erin Rinehart on behalf of Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC, filed. (Rinehart, Erin) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Megan Rapp on behalf of Texas Republic Utility, LLC, filed. (Rapp, Megan) |
| Filing 2 ANSWER to #1 State Court Petition/Notice of Removal by Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC, filed.(Lindley, James) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 457th Judicial District Court, Montgomery County, case number 23-07-09819 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30311193) filed by Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Executed Process, #2 Exhibit B - Plaintiff's Original Petition, #3 Exhibit C - State Docket Report, #4 Exhibit D - Index of Matters Being Filed, #5 Exhibit List of Counsel of Record)(Lindley, James) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Texas Republic Utility, LLC v. Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Texas Republic Utility, LLC | |
| Represented By: | Megan Bibb Rapp |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Gulf South Pipeline Company, LLC | |
| Represented By: | James Robinson Lindley |
| Represented By: | Erin Dawn Rinehart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
