Community National Bank v. JPMorgan Chase Bank et al
Community National Bank |
JPMorgan Chase Bank and Nicole Santos |
4:2023cv03052 |
August 18, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Andrew S Hanen |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER OF PARTIAL DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE granting #3 Stipulation of Dismissal. All claims and causes of action brought by and between Plaintiff, Community National Bank and Defendant, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. are dismissed with prejudice. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(JoanDavenport, 4) |
Filing 3 STIPULATION of Dismissal by JPMorgan Chase Bank, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Grill, Jason) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 11/27/2023 at 10:20 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 11th District Court of Harris County Texas, case number 2023-43553 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30379398) filed by JPMorgan Chase Bank. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B, #4 Exhibit C)(Grill, Jason) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.