Johnson v. Checkr, Inc.
Christopher Johnson |
Checkr, Inc and Checkr, Inc. |
4:2023cv03329 |
September 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
George C Hanks |
Consumer Credit |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER granting #16 Joint MOTION to Compel Arbitration. It is ORDERED that the above-captioned action is hereby stayed pending the completion of arbitration, or further order of the Court. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (ByronThomas, 4) |
The Initial Conference set for 1/3/2024 at 09:00 AM by video is CANCELED. (ByronThomas, 4) |
Filing 16 Joint MOTION to Compel Arbitration by Checkr, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 11/13/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gray, Andrew) |
Filing 15 ORDER granting #14 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. (Answer due 11/13/2023 for Checkr, Inc.) (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (ByronThomas, 4) |
The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (ByronThomas, 4) |
Filing 14 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Checkr, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/31/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gray, Andrew) |
Filing 13 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Checkr, Inc., filed.(Gray, Andrew) |
Filing 12 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Checkr, Inc. served on 9/21/2023, answer due 10/12/2023, filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 11 Summons Issued as to Checkr, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
Filing 10 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Checkr, Inc., filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 9 Summons Issued as to Checkr, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
Filing 8 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Checkr, Inc., filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 7 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/3/2024 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(JoanDavenport, 4) |
Filing 6 Summons Issued as to Checkr, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JoanDavenport, 4) |
Filing 5 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Checkr, Inc, filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Checkr, Inc, filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Checkr, Inc, filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Filing 2 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants (Filing fee $402 paid on 9/6/2023, receipt number ATXSDC-30470808) filed by Christopher Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit)(Jaffer, Shawn) Payment information added on 9/7/2023 (LisaTien, 4). |
Filing 1 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Christopher Johnson, filed.(Jaffer, Shawn) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.