Lenear v. Deputy A. Beal et al
| Dakari J. Lenear |
| Deputy A. Beal, Deputy M. Quintanilla, Deputy J. Reinert, Deputy J. Viramontes, Deputy F. Donalson, Deputy A. King, Deputy R. Sanchez, Deputy D. Crain, Deputy B. Callihan, Deputy Berry, Deputy J. Wright, Deputy Kindall, Deputy S. Churgings, Deputy T. Westmoreland and Deputy Lt. W. Lorry |
| 4:2023cv03446 |
| September 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel by Dakari J. Lenear, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/29/2023. (DarleneHansen, 4) |
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.(Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(JacquelineMata, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Dakari J. Lenear, filed. (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Dakari J. Lenear, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/4/2023. (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Dakari J. Lenear. (AaronJackson, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
