Gates v. Social Security
| David W. Gates |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
| 4:2023cv03462 |
| September 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Sam S Sheldon |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7405 Recovery of Overpayment of Taxes |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security, filed.(Poole, Eric) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric D. Poole on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security, filed. (Poole, Eric) |
Filing 4
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Sam S Sheldon.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(KimberlyPicota, 4)
|
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Adriana M. de la Torre on behalf of David W. Gates, filed. (de la Torre, Adriana) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by David W. Gates, filed. Motion Docket Date 10/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(de la Torre, Adriana) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security (Commissioner of SSA and U.S. Attorney served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) filed by David W. Gates. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(de la Torre, Adriana) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
