Briseno v. The Kroger Co.
| Jessica Briseno |
| The Kroger Co. |
| 4:2023cv03675 |
| September 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by The Kroger Co., filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
Filing 8
ORDER Striking Document re: #3 Motion to Dismiss filed by The Kroger Co. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ByronThomas, 4)
|
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (ByronThomas, 4) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ByronThomas, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Premise Liability Cases Involving Slips, Trips, or Falls.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ByronThomas, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/7/2024 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(JoanDavenport, 4)
|
| Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint by The Kroger Co., filed.(Williams, Troy) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Dismiss by The Kroger Co., filed. Motion Docket Date 10/23/2023. (Williams, Troy) |
| Filing 2 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by The Kroger Co., filed.(Ly, Valerie) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 234 JDC of Harris County, case number 2023-59345 (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30590734) filed by The Kroger Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A and B for Notice of Removal - All Pleadings & Orders, #2 Exhibit Exhibit C for Notice of Removal - Index of Matters, #3 Exhibit Exhibit D for Notice of Removal - Counsel of Record)(Ly, Valerie) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Briseno v. The Kroger Co. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Jessica Briseno | |
| Represented By: | Thaison Danny Hua |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The Kroger Co. | |
| Represented By: | Valerie Lu Ly |
| Represented By: | Troy A Williams |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
