Rakiep v. Hess Corporation et al
JANAID RAKIEP |
HESS CORPORATION, INSPECTRAM LIMITED, SOUTHEY MAURITIUS LTD, Hess Corporation doing business as Hess Exploration and Production and Southey Mauritius Ltd doing business as Southey Contracting Offshore Division |
4:2023cv03802 |
October 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Sim Lake |
P.I.: Other |
43 U.S.C. § 1333 Outer Continental Shelf Lands Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 18 Summons Issued as to Inspectram Limited. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Mootness re: #13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint, #10 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Janaid Rakiep, filed. (Doyle, Michael) |
Filing 16 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Inspectram Limited, filed.(Doyle, Michael) |
Filing 15 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Hess Corporation, Inspectram Limited, Southey Contracting Offshore Division, Southey Mauritius Ltd filed by Janaid Rakiep.(Doyle, Michael) |
Filing 14 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Southey Mauritius Ltd, filed.(Shodrok, Nicholas) |
Filing 13 MOTION to Dismiss Plaintiff's Complaint by Southey Mauritius Ltd, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/11/2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 1A, #3 Exhibit 2, #4 Exhibit 3, #5 Exhibit 4, #6 Exhibit 5, #7 Exhibit 6, #8 Exhibit 7, #9 Exhibit 8, #10 Exhibit 9, #11 Exhibit 10, #12 Exhibit 11, #13 Exhibit 12, #14 Exhibit 13, #15 Exhibit 14, #16 Exhibit 15, #17 Exhibit 16, #18 Exhibit 17, #19 Exhibit 18, #20 Proposed Order)(Shodrok, Nicholas) |
Filing 12 Return of Service Unexecuted as to Hess Corporation re: Foreign Process, filed.(FrancesCarbia, 2) |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Hess Corporation, filed.(Pector, Michelle) |
Filing 10 MOTION to Dismiss #1 Complaint by Hess Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/30/2023. (Pector, Michelle) |
Filing 9 ORDER - Granting #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer to Complaint ; Answer due for Southey Mauritius Ltd 11/20/2023. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(SheilaRAnderson, 4) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE of Conference re: #7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer to Complaint by Southey Mauritius Ltd, filed.(Henderson, Lisa) |
Filing 7 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer to Complaint by Southey Mauritius Ltd, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/20/2023. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Henderson, Lisa) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Janaid Rakiep, filed.(Doyle, Michael) |
Filing 5 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Southey Mauritius Ltd served on 10/16/2023, answer due 11/6/2023, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 4 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/26/2024 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(JoanDavenport, 4) |
Filing 3 Summons Issued as to Hess Corporation, Inspectram Limited, Southey Mauritius Ltd. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JoanDavenport, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Additional summons, #2 Supplement Additional summons)(Doyle, Michael) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30630865) filed by JANAID RAKIEP.(Doyle, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.