Rodriguez v. Chisum et al
Plaintiff: Jonathan Rodriguez
Defendant: Johnothan Chisum and Nathaniel Robertson
Case Number: 4:2023cv03912
Filed: October 13, 2023
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: David Hittner
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. It is ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. Rodriguez is advised, however, that upon a showing of good cause for his failure to comply with the Court's October 19 Order, relief from this Order may be granted under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b). Any motion under Rule 60(b) must be accompanied by either payment of the filing fee or a properly supported application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, including a complete certified copy of his inmate trust fund account statement for the six months prior to September 2023. Case terminated on 12/05/2023. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
October 16, 2023 Filing 7 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Jonathan Rodriguez. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 11/15/2023, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (BeverlyGoolsby, 4)
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Docketed in error. ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND AND SEVERING CLAIMS. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4) Modified on 10/13/2023 (JosephWells, 4).
October 13, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (JosephWells, 4)
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO AMEND AND SEVERING CLAIMS. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
October 13, 2023 Filing 3 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Johnothan Chisum, Nathaniel Robertson filed by Jonathan Rodriguez. Related document: #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan Rodriguez. (Attachments: #1 Continuation, #2 Continuation, #3 Continuation)(JosephWells, 4)
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER STRIKING COMPLAINT re: #1 Complaint filed by Jonathan Rodriguez. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
October 13, 2023 Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Johnothan Chisum, Nathaniel Robertson (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Jonathan Rodriguez.(JosephWells, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Chisum et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Jonathan Rodriguez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Johnothan Chisum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Nathaniel Robertson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?