Carter v. Strong et al
| Kevin Paul Carter |
| Kelly L Strong, Bob Castleberry, Michael Kukua and Rhoda Otunblogan |
| 4:2023cv03931 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Initial Partial Filing fee: $2.00 re: #5 Clerks Memo to Prisoner (FORM, noticing) - Civil, receipt number 400003125, filed. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
| Filing 5 CLERKS NOTICE to Prisoner. Parties notified, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (BeverlyGoolsby, 4) |
| Partial PLRA Filing fee: $400.00 re: #1 Complaint, #4 Notice of Deficient Pleading (FORM), receipt number 400002524, filed. (KenOradiegwu, 4) |
| Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE OF DEFICIENT PLEADING as to Kevin Paul Carter. Parties notified Notice of Compliance due by 11/22/2023, filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix) (BeverlyGoolsby, 4) |
| Filing 3 MOTION for Leave to File Unsworn Declaration by Kevin Paul Carter, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/13/2023. (MarcelleLaBee, 4) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Kevin Paul Carter. (AaronJackson, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
