Desouze v. Osteen et al
| Neville Ambrose Desouze |
| Joel Osteen, Victoria Osteen and Lakewood Church |
| 4:2023cv03935 |
| October 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 4
FINAL JUDGMENT - For the reasons set forth in the court's Memorandum Opinion and Order entered on this date, this action is DISMISSED with prejudice...*** Case terminated on 10/18/23. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(SheilaRAnderson, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER - The plaintiff's #1 Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2)(B). The dismissal will count as a STRIKE for purposes of 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). Prison officials at the TDCJ Inmate Trust Fund shall deduct the filing fee for indigent litigants ($350.00) from the inmate trust fund account. *** Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(SheilaRAnderson, 4) *** copy emailed to TDCJ Inmate Trust Fund
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (DMcKinnieRichardson, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 402) filed by Neville Ambrose Desouze.(DMcKinnieRichardson, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
