Wiley v. Commissioner of Social Security et al
Javion Wiley |
Commissioner of the Social Security Administration |
Social Security Administration-Office of General Counsel |
4:2023cv03936 |
October 13, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Sam S Sheldon |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER re: Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(A), all nondispositive pretrial matters in this case have been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Sam S. Sheldon for determination. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), all dispositive pretrial matters in this case have been referred to United States Magistrate Judge Sam S. Sheldon for report and recommendation to this court. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(JacquelineMata, 4) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Roberta G. Bowie on behalf of Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, filed. (Bowie, Roberta) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of the Social Security Administration (IFP granted on 10/13/2023 by Judge Andrew S Hanen)( (Commissioner of SSA and U.S. Attorney served by NEF at the designated email addresses.) filed by Javion Wiley. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.