Alkhalili v. Laney et al
Anamilena Alkhalili |
Erik Laney and Santander |
4:2023cv04086 |
October 23, 2023 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Truth in Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 REPLY to Response to #4 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) & 12(B)(6), filed by Santander. (Martinelli, Brent) |
Filing 5 Answer to #4 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) & 12(B)(6) filed by Anamilena Alkhalili. (KimberlyPicota, 4) |
Filing 4 MOTION to Dismiss Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(B)(1) & 12(B)(6) by Santander, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/5/2023. (Martinelli, Brent) |
Filing 3 ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 2/9/2024 at 10:40 AM in by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified. (LisaTien, 4) |
Filing 2 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (LisaTien, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis granted by Judge Andrew S Hanen on 10/23/23) filed by Anamilena Alkhalili. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (LisaTien, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.