Nweme v. The United States of America et al
| Molika Akwo Nweme |
| The United States of America and GEO Joe Corley Detention Center |
| 4:2023cv04360 |
| November 14, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. #1 Complaint is dismissed against the US with prejudice. Complaint against GEO Group/ Joe Corley Detention Center is dismissed without prejudice. Any pending motions are denied as moot. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified.(GabrielleLyons, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
SUPPLEMENT to #1 Complaint by Molika Akwo Nweme, filed.(DarleneHansen, 4)
|
|
Initial Filing fee: $405.00 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number 400003509, filed. (GloriaVasquez, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
NOTICE of Failure to Provide Medical Records by Geo Joe Corley Detention Center by Molika Akwo Nweme, filed. (DarleneHansen, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Molika Akwo Nweme, filed.(FrancesCarbia, 2)
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by Molika Akwo Nweme.(AkeitaMichael, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
