Bingham v. Farrell et al
| William Bingham |
| Captain Christopher Farrell, Warden Donald Muniz and Lt. Caballaro |
| 4:2023cv04386 |
| November 16, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER TO TRANSFER CASE to USDC ED/TX- Lufkin (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(GabrielleLyons, 4)
|
| Filing 4 MEMORANDUM ON TRANSFER denying #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(GabrielleLyons, 4) |
| Interdistrict transfer to USDC ED/TX- Lufkin. Case transferred electronically. Case terminated on 12/18/23., filed. (GabrielleLyons, 4) |
| RECEIPT of Transfer Letter re: transfer of case to Eastern District of Texas. New Case # assigned: 9:23-cv-00228 and received on 12/18/2023., filed. (MarcelleLaBee, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by William Bingham, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/7/2023. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants filed by William Bingham.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
