Herod v. DMS Solutions Inc
| Daryl Herod |
| DMS Solutions Inc |
| 4:2023cv04465 |
| November 28, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer or Otherwise Respond by DMS Solutions Inc, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/16/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Reeves, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by William M. Hogg on behalf of Daryl Herod, filed. (Hogg, William) |
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (ByronThomas, 4) |
Filing 8
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (ByronThomas, 4)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for FLSA.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(ByronThomas, 4)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J. (Rex) Burch on behalf of Daryl Herod, filed. (Burch, Richard) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/10/2024 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4)
|
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to DMS Solutions Inc. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew W. Dunlap on behalf of Daryl Herod, filed. (Dunlap, Andrew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to DMS Solutions Inc, filed.(Josephson, Michael) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against DMS Solutions Inc (Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ATXSDC-30858413) filed by Daryl Herod. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Consent)(Josephson, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Herod v. DMS Solutions Inc | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Daryl Herod | |
| Represented By: | Andrew Wells Dunlap |
| Represented By: | Michael A Josephson |
| Represented By: | Richard J Burch |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DMS Solutions Inc | |
| Represented By: | Matthew G Reeves |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
