Siddiqui et al v. U.S. Department of State
| Komel Siddiqui and Zakir Ullah Siddiqui |
| Secretary U.S. Department of State |
| 4:2023cv04533 |
| December 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Other Immigration Actions |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time Answer by Secretary U.S. Department of State, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Robinson-Gaither, Eleanor) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Defendant. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RebeccaBecknal, 4) |
Filing 3
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 2/27/2024 at 10:15 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4)
|
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Secretary U.S. Department of State, filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit As to USAG, #2 Exhibit As to USAO)(Brown, Steven) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Secretary U.S. Department of State (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-30884788) filed by Komel SIDDIQUI, Zakir Ullah SIDDIQUI. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Brown, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
