Direct Digital Holdings, Inc. v. White Diamond Research LLC et al
| Direct Digital Holdings, Inc. |
| White Diamond Research LLC and Adam Gefvert |
| 4:2023cv04641 |
| December 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on 12/22/2023. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JennelleGonzalez, 4)
|
|
Filing 11
OPINION AND ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER denying #8 EMERGENCY MOTION MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order MOTION for Preliminary Injunction, #9 MOTION for Discovery. The motion by Plaintiff Direct Digital Holdings, Inc, for a temporary restraining order is DENIED. Dkt 8. DRCT is ORDERED to immediately provide this Order to Defendants White Diamond Research and Adam Gefvert through any and all known email channels. The motion by Plaintiff Direct Digital Holdings, Inc, for leave to take expedited discovery is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. Dkts 8 & 9. To the extent DRCT further desires to pursue a preliminary injunction, it must promptly serve Defendants White Diamond Research and Adam Gefvert. It may then bring any motion, including a renewed motion for expedited discovery, after conference in good faith with its adversaries. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JennelleGonzalez, 4)
|
| Filing 10 Agreed MOTION to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) by Direct Digital Holdings, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cornelia, Matthew) |
| Filing 9 MOTION for Discovery by Direct Digital Holdings, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/10/2024. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Exhibits 1-3, #2 Proposed Order)(Cornelia, Matthew) |
| Filing 8 EMERGENCY MOTION( Motion Docket Date 1/10/2024.), MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order, MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Direct Digital Holdings, Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Appendix of Exhibits 1-18, #2 Proposed Order)(Cornelia, Matthew) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Robert A. Muckenfuss (Fee Paid: $100, receipt number ATXSDC-30955469) by Direct Digital Holdings, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/9/2024. (Muckenfuss, Robert) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Kelly A. Warlich (Fee Paid: $100, receipt number ATXSDC-30943732) by Direct Digital Holdings, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/5/2024. (Warlich, Kelly) |
| Filing 5 MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Lucy J. Wheatley (Fee Paid: $100, receipt number ATXSDC-30943586) by Direct Digital Holdings, Inc., filed. Motion Docket Date 1/5/2024. (Wheatley, Lucy) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Adam Gefvert, White Diamond Research LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(JoanDavenport, 4) |
| Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Direct Digital Holdings, Inc., filed.(Cornelia, Matthew) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Adam Gefvert, White Diamond Research LLC, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons - Adam Gefvert)(Cornelia, Matthew) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Adam Gefvert, White Diamond Research LLC (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-30926537) filed by Direct Digital Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Civil Cover Sheet)(Cornelia, Matthew) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
