Gomez et al v. United State of America
| Joe Gomez and Manuela Gomez |
| United State of America |
| 4:2023cv04731 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Kenneth M Hoyt |
| Motor Vehicle |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1346 Tort Claim |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to United State of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 7/8/2024 at 09:00 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(AaronJackson, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to United State of America, filed.(Todd, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to United State of America, filed.(Todd, Jeffrey) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against United State of America (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BTXSDC-30960344) filed by Joe Gomez, Manuela Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Todd, Jeffrey) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
