Narcisse v. Dean's Professional Services
| Daniel Narcisse |
| DEANS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES and Dean's Professional Services |
| 4:2023cv04751 |
| December 20, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Keith P Ellison |
| Labor: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Sex Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 ANSWER to #1 Amended Complaint/Counterclaim/Crossclaim etc. by Dean's Professional Services, filed.(Rao, Sidd) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Daniel Narcisse, filed.(Kennard, Alfonso) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Dean's Professional Services, filed.(Rao, Sidd) |
| Filing 4 Summons Issued as to Dean's Professional Services. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Deans Professional Services, filed.(Kennard, Alfonso) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/29/2024 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 3A Houston before Judge Keith P Ellison. (Signed by Judge Keith P Ellison) Parties notified.(AaronJackson, 4)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against Deans Professional Services (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-30963037) filed by Daniel Narcisse. |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
