Sheikh v. Asad Businesses Inc. et al
| Arif Sheikh |
| Asad Businesses Inc, Imran Hamani and Asad Businesses Inc. |
| 4:2023cv04772 |
| December 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Labor: Fair Standards |
| 29 U.S.C. ยง 201 Fair Labor Standards Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(Sosa-Morris, Beatriz) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Arif Sheikh, filed.(Sosa-Morris, Beatriz) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 3/21/2024 at 10:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Peter Bray. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified.(AaronJackson, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Defendants, filed. (Attachments: #1 Continuation)(Sosa-Morris, Beatriz) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-30968137) filed by Arif Sheikh. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Consent Form, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Sosa-Morris, Beatriz) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
