Crump v. Martinez et al
Jonathan Crump |
Ana Martinez, Kathryn Scheffer, Mario Madrid, Ed Gonzalez and R. Moore |
4:2024cv00122 |
January 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Alfred H Bennett |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Jonathan Crump, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 5 NON-CONSENT to Proceed Before a Magistrate Judge by Jonathan Crump, filed.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Summons Issued as to Ed Gonzalez, Mario Madrid, Ana Martinez, R. Moore, Kathryn Scheffer. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by First-class mail, filed.(KimberlyPicota, 4) |
Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Jonathan Crump, filed.(AngelMireles, 2) |
Filing 3 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Filing 2 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/3/2024 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 9A before Judge Alfred H Bennett. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified.(AkeitaMichael, 4) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Ed Gonzalez, Mario Madrid, Ana Martinez, R. Moore, Kathryn Scheffer filed by Jonathan Crump. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing fee received: $405 re: #1 Complaint, receipt number 400003835, filed. (BrandisIsom, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.