Robstown Eagle Food Mart, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. The United States Of America
| Robstown Eagle Food Mart, Inc., a Texas Corporation |
| The United States Of America |
| 4:2024cv00149 |
| January 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| George C Hanks |
| Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Dismissal as to The United States Of America by Robstown Eagle Food Mart, Inc., a Texas Corporation, filed. (Neal, Samuel) |
| The above entitled action is assigned to United States District Judge George C. Hanks, Jr. Attorneys and Pro Se individuals are responsible for complying with this Court's rules and procedures, specifically, under Rule 6. Motion Practice. B. Pre-Motion Conferences Required for Particular Motions. Please download and review the individual practices of the assigned District Judge, located at: https://www.txs.uscourts.gov/sites/txs/files/GCH_Court_Procedures.pdf. (Note: If clicking the link does not work, you can copy/paste the url into your web browser address bar to view the procedures.) (ByronThomas, 4) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Robstown Eagle Food Mart, Inc., a Texas Corporation, filed.(Neal, Samuel) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to The United States Of America, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General. Issued summons returned to plaintiff by NEF, filed.(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 5/29/2024 at 09:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Andrew M Edison. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified.(RebeccaBecknal, 4)
|
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to The United States Of America, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons Request - U.S. Attorney for the S.D. TX)(Neal, Samuel) |
| Filing 2 Other EXHIBITS re: #1 Complaint by Robstown Eagle Food Mart, Inc., a Texas Corporation, filed.(Neal, Samuel) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against The United States Of America (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31052982) filed by Robstown Eagle Food Mart, Inc., a Texas Corporation.(Neal, Samuel) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Robstown Eagle Food Mart, Inc., a Texas Corporation v. The United States Of America | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Robstown Eagle Food Mart, Inc., a Texas Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Samuel Loyd Neal, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: The United States Of America | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
