Bentley v. Specialty Fenestration Group et al
Caleb Bentley |
Specialty Fenestration Group, Quick Serv, Inc. and QuickServ, Inc. doing business as Specialty Fenestration Group |
4:2024cv00245 |
January 22, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Kenneth M Hoyt |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by QuickServ, Inc., filed.(Hunter, Veronica) |
Filing 4 Summons Issued as to QuickServ, Inc.. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (MarcelleLaBee, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference by Telephone and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Counsel who filed or removed the action is responsible for placing the conference call and insuring that all parties are on the line. The call shall be placed to (713)250-5613. Telephone Conference set for 7/22/2024 at 09:30 AM by telephone before Judge Kenneth M Hoyt (Signed by Judge Kenneth M Hoyt) Parties notified.(ClaudiaGutierrez, 4) |
Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Quick Serv, Inc., filed.(Woodfill, Jared) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31096327) filed by Caleb Bentley. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit TWFC Complaint, #2 Exhibit TWFC Nov. 17, 2023 Letter, #3 Exhibit TWFC Notice of Right)(Woodfill, Jared) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.