Graves v. Name Unknown #1 et al
| Scott Graves |
| Name Unknown #1 and Name Unknown #2 |
| 4:2024cv00270 |
| January 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 5
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. For the reasons stated in this courts memorandum opinion and order, this case is dismissed without prejudice. Case terminated on 2/8/2024. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (GlendaHassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 4
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER. Gravess complaint is dismissed without prejudice, and his motion to proceed without prepaying the filing fee is denied #2 . Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (GlendaHassan, 4)
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AaronJackson, 4)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Scott Graves, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/14/2024. (AaronJackson, 4)
|
|
Filing 1
Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Name Unknown #1, Name Unknown #2 (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Scott Graves. (AaronJackson, 4)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
