Anderson v. Tiamiyu et al
| Keenan Novon Anderson |
| Lukumon Tiamiyu, Maxwell Eke and Amber Ocoha |
| 4:2024cv00276 |
| January 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| David Hittner |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER OF DISMISSAL. This action is DISMISSED without prejudice for want of prosecution. Case terminated on 03/14/2024. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER FOR MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT as to Keenan Novon Anderson. More Definite Statement due by 3/4/2024. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. (Signed by Judge David Hittner) Parties notified.(JosephWells, 4)
|
| Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Keenan Novon Anderson, filed. (Attachments: #1 Trust Duplicate Statement) (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Keenan Novon Anderson, filed. Motion Docket Date 2/14/2024. (AaronJackson, 4) |
| Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against Maxwell Eke, Amber Ocoha, Lukumon Tiamiyu (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Keenan Novon Anderson. (AaronJackson, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
