Holliday v. Joel F. Shaw Partnership et al
| Terrance Holliday |
| Joel F. Shaw Partnership and State Eagle Ent., Inc. |
| 4:2024cv00359 |
| January 31, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 MOTION for Leave to Appear Telephonically or Zoom at Scheduling Conf. set for April 26, 2024 by Terrance Holliday, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/7/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Schapiro, Douglas) |
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/26/2024 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified.(JoanDavenport, 4)
|
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Terrance Holliday, filed.(Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Joel F. Shaw Partnership, State Eagle Ent., Inc., filed. (Attachments: #1 Summons)(Schapiro, Douglas) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joel F. Shaw Partnership, State Eagle Ent., Inc. (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31130243) filed by Terrance Holliday. (Attachments: #1 Receipt, #2 Selfie, #3 Civil Cover Sheet)(Schapiro, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
