Ascione v. Sigma Alpha Epsilon Texas Rho Chapter House Corporation et al
Julian Ascione |
Sigma Alpha Epsilon Texas Rho Chapter House Corporation, Sigma Alpha Epsilon Texas Rho Chapter, Brent Bechtol and Jack Ferruzzo |
4:2024cv00439 |
February 6, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 ORDER OF REMAND granting #2 Unopposed MOTION to Remand. This action is hereby remanded to the 270th Judicial District Court of Harris County, Texas. Case terminated on 02/22/2024.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JennelleGonzalez, 4) |
Filing 2 Unopposed MOTION to Remand by Brent Bechtol, Sigma Alpha Epsilon Texas Rho Chapter House Corporation, filed. Motion Docket Date 3/1/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Cashiola, Randal) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 270th Judicial District Court of Harris County Texas, case number 2024-02078 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31155602) filed by Brent Bechtol, Sigma Alpha Epsilon Texas Rho Chapter House Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A, #3 Exhibit B-1, #4 Exhibit B-2, #5 Exhibit B-3, #6 Exhibit B-4, #7 Exhibit B-5, #8 Exhibit C, #9 Exhibit D, #10 Exhibit E)(Cashiola, Randal) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.