Lo v. Clear Blue Insurance Company
Feng Lo |
Clear Blue Insurance Company |
4:2024cv00485 |
February 9, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Charles Eskridge |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 NOTICE of Resetting. Parties notified. Initial Conference set for 5/1/2024 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Charles Eskridge, filed. (JennelleGonzalez, 4) |
Filing 10 JOINT DISCOVERY/CASE MANAGEMENT PLAN by Clear Blue Insurance Company, filed. (Reilley, Steven) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Joseph Milensky on behalf of Feng Lo, filed. (Fulton, Amanda) |
Filing 8 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Feng Lo, filed.(Fulton, Amanda) |
Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Clear Blue Insurance Company, filed.(Reilley, Steven) |
Filing 6 STATEMENT of Information In A Removed Action by Clear Blue Insurance Company, filed. (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Service In A Removed Action)(Reilley, Steven) |
Filing 5 SCHEDULING and DOCKET CONTROL ORDER. Amended Pleadings due by 05/17/2024. Joinder of Parties due by 05/17/2024. Plaintiff Expert Report due by 06/18/2024. Deft Expert Report due by 07/03/2024. Discovery due by 08/02/2024. Mediation due by 08/20/2024. Joint Pretrial Order due by 09/04/2024. Docket Call set for 10/15/2024 at 1:30 PM before Judge Charles Eskridge. (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jennellegonzalez) (Entered: 02/27/2024) |
Filing 4 Order in Removed Case. Statement due within ten days.(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified.(JennelleGonzalez, 4) |
Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/17/2024 at 10:30 AM in Courtroom 9F before Judge Charles Eskridge(Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified.(JennelleGonzalez, 4) |
Filing 2 ANSWER to Complaint by Clear Blue Insurance Company, filed.(Reilley, Steven) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 458th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, case number 24-DCV-311896 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31179891) filed by Clear Blue Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Notice of Removal - Index of Matters, #2 Exhibit Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit Filings, #4 Exhibit List of Counsel, #5 Civil Cover Sheet)(Reilley, Steven) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Lo v. Clear Blue Insurance Company | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Feng Lo | |
Represented By: | Amanda Jean Fulton |
Represented By: | Chad Troy Wilson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Clear Blue Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Steven Scott Reilley |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.