Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD) v. Diogu II
Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD) |
Diogu Kalu Diogu II |
4:2024cv00779 |
March 4, 2024 |
US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
Lee H Rosenthal |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 3/27/2024 re: 10 Document(s) Sent, filed. (rlm4) |
Filing 11 A check in the amount of $405 received from Diogu Law Firm PLLC returned to the Clerk's Office as Insufficient Funds., filed. (khn4) |
Filing 9 REMAND ORDER re: #4 EMERGENCY MOTION to Remand. The motion to remand is meritorious. This case is remanded to the 458th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, TX. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (mmm4) |
Filing 8 EMERGENCY MOTION for Setting a Status Conference by Diogu Kalu Diogu II, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (dm4) |
Filing 7 MOTION to Quash Attorney Suspension and Request and Emergency Hearing by Commission for Diogu K. Diogu, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (srh4) |
Filing 6 NOTICE Of Related Case in A Bankruptcy Court by Diogu Kalu Diogu II, filed. (BrendaLacy, 4) |
Filing 5 MOTION to Consolidate by Diogu Kalu Diogu II, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (BrendaLacy, 4) |
Filing 4 Opposed EMERGENCY MOTION to REMAND (Motion Docket Date 4/1/2024.) by Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD), filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-7, #2 Exhibits 8-16, #3 Proposed Order)(BrandisIsom, 4) |
Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION for Reconsideration and to Set Aside Interlocutory Default Judgment ( Motion Docket Date 3/28/2024.), and to Dismiss by Diogu Kalu Diogu II, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BrendaLacy, 4) |
Filing 2 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 458th Judicial District of Fort Bend County, Texas, case number 21-DCV-279744 (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Diogu Kalu Diogu II.(MayraMarquez, 4) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 458th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, case number 21-DCV-279744 ( Filing fee $ 405) filed by Diogu Kalu Diogu II. (Attachments: #1 exhibits cont, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
Confirmation of receipt of payment from Diogu Kalu Digu II in the amount of $ 405.00 re: #1 Notice of Removal. Receipt date: 3/4/2024. Receipt number 400004770. Purpose Description: filing fee. (RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD) v. Diogu II | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD) | |
Represented By: | John S Brannon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Diogu Kalu Diogu II | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.