Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD) v. Diogu II
Plaintiff: Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD)
Defendant: Diogu Kalu Diogu II
Case Number: 4:2024cv00779
Filed: March 4, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Lee H Rosenthal
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 2, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 2, 2024 ***Delivery Confirmation for delivery date(s) 3/27/2024 re: 10 Document(s) Sent, filed. (rlm4)
March 28, 2024 Filing 11 A check in the amount of $405 received from Diogu Law Firm PLLC returned to the Clerk's Office as Insufficient Funds., filed. (khn4)
March 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 REMAND ORDER re: #4 EMERGENCY MOTION to Remand. The motion to remand is meritorious. This case is remanded to the 458th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, TX. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (mmm4)
March 25, 2024 Filing 8 EMERGENCY MOTION for Setting a Status Conference by Diogu Kalu Diogu II, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/15/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (dm4)
March 22, 2024 Filing 7 MOTION to Quash Attorney Suspension and Request and Emergency Hearing by Commission for Diogu K. Diogu, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/12/2024. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (srh4)
March 18, 2024 Filing 6 NOTICE Of Related Case in A Bankruptcy Court by Diogu Kalu Diogu II, filed. (BrendaLacy, 4)
March 18, 2024 Filing 5 MOTION to Consolidate by Diogu Kalu Diogu II, filed. Motion Docket Date 4/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (BrendaLacy, 4)
March 11, 2024 Filing 4 Opposed EMERGENCY MOTION to REMAND (Motion Docket Date 4/1/2024.) by Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD), filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits 1-7, #2 Exhibits 8-16, #3 Proposed Order)(BrandisIsom, 4)
March 7, 2024 Filing 3 EMERGENCY MOTION for Reconsideration and to Set Aside Interlocutory Default Judgment ( Motion Docket Date 3/28/2024.), and to Dismiss by Diogu Kalu Diogu II, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(BrendaLacy, 4)
March 6, 2024 Filing 2 AMENDED NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 458th Judicial District of Fort Bend County, Texas, case number 21-DCV-279744 (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Diogu Kalu Diogu II.(MayraMarquez, 4)
March 4, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 458th Judicial District Court of Fort Bend County, case number 21-DCV-279744 ( Filing fee $ 405) filed by Diogu Kalu Diogu II. (Attachments: #1 exhibits cont, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4)
March 4, 2024 Confirmation of receipt of payment from Diogu Kalu Digu II in the amount of $ 405.00 re: #1 Notice of Removal. Receipt date: 3/4/2024. Receipt number 400004770. Purpose Description: filing fee. (RhondaMooreKonieczny, 4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD) v. Diogu II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Commission for Lawyer Discipline (CFLD)
Represented By: John S Brannon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Diogu Kalu Diogu II
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?