Hopper, et al v. Heroes Technology (US) LLC et al
| Lacey and Chase Hopper, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Revel Hopper, Lacey Hopper, Chase Hopper and Personal Representative of the Estate of Revel Hopper |
| Heroes Technology (US) LLC d/b/a Snuggle Me Organic, August River Co., Heroes Technology (US) LLC doing business as Snuggle Me Organic, Heroes Technology (US) LLC, Heroes Technology Ltd., Simply Mommy, LLC and Peak 21 Holdings, Inc. |
| 4:2024cv01200 |
| April 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Sim Lake |
| Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Second AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Plaintiffs filed by Lacey Hopper, Chase Hopper, Personal Representative of the Estate of Revel Hopper. (Weycer, Mark)
|
|
Filing 13
MOTION for Leave to File Second Amended Complaint by Chase Hopper, Lacey Hopper, Personal Representative of the Estate of Revel Hopper, filed. Motion Docket Date 6/13/2024. (Weycer, Mark)
|
|
Filing 12
FINAL JUDGMENT - In accordance with the Order of Dismissal Without Prejudice for Failure to Allege Facts Showing Subject Matter Jurisdiction, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction...*** Case terminated on 5/23/24. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (sra4)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO ALLEGE FACTS SHOWING SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION - Plaintiffs filed a #10 First Amended Complaint that does not allege facts showing a valid basis for either federal question or diversity jurisdiction. Accordingly, this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (sra4)
|
|
Filing 10
First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Plaintiffs filed by Chase Hopper, Lacey Hopper, Personal Representative of the Estate of Revel Hopper. (Weycer, Mark)
|
|
Filing 9
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Heroes Technology (US) LLC, filed. (Skyler, Nelson)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER to Amend #1 Plaintiff's Complaint to Allege Facts Establishing Subject Matter Jurisdiction. Amended Complaint due by 5/21/2024. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (glc4)
|
|
Filing 7
ANSWER to #1 Complaint, by Heroes Technology (US) LLC, filed. (Skyler, Nelson)
|
|
Filing 6
CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Chase Hopper, Lacey Hopper, Personal Representative of the Estate of Revel Hopper, filed. (Weycer, Mark)
|
|
Filing 5
DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Chase Hopper, Lacey Hopper, Personal Representative of the Estate of Revel Hopper, filed. (Weycer, Mark)
|
|
Filing 4
Summons Issued as to Heroes Technology (US) LLC. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (mew4)
|
|
Filing 3
Request for Issuance of Summons as to All Plaintiffs, filed. (Weycer, Mark)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 6/28/2024 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 9B before Judge Sim Lake. (Signed by Judge Sim Lake) Parties notified. (cng4)
|
|
Filing 1
COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31410506) filed by Lacey and Chase Hopper, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Revel Hopper. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Weycer, Mark)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
