United States of America v. $587,100 In U.S. Dollars
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| $587,100 IN U.S. DOLLARS and $587,000 In U.S. Dollars |
| 4:2024cv01756 |
| May 10, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Charles Eskridge |
| Forfeit/Penalty: Other |
| 18 U.S.C. ยง 0981 Forfeiture in Rem |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE Declaration of Publication by United States of America, filed. (Rollinson, Kristine) |
| Filing 7 RETURN of Service Executed as to USMS on 6/6/2024 re: Warrant of Arrest in Rem, filed. (dah4) |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE of #1 Complaint by United States of America, filed. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Forfeiture to Rick Figueroa) (Rollinson, Kristine) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by United States of America, filed. (Rollinson, Kristine) |
| Filing 4 WARRANT of Arrest in Rem issued, filed. (jmg4) |
Filing 3
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE WARRANT OF ARREST IN REM (Signed by Judge Charles Eskridge) Parties notified. (jmg4)
|
| Filing 2 NOTICE Requesting Clerk to Issue Warrant of Arrest in Rem by United States of America, filed. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order, #2 Warrant of Arrest in Rem) (Rollinson, Kristine) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against $587,100 IN U.S. DOLLARS filed by UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. (Rollinson, Kristine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
