Mitchell et al v. Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company
| Tony Mitchell and Stacey Mitchell |
| Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company |
| 4:2024cv02115 |
| June 5, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Andrew S Hanen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MOTION for Natalie Barden and Tabatha Fuentes to Withdraw as Attorney by Stacey Mitchell, Tony Mitchell, filed. Motion Docket Date 8/22/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Barden, Natalie) |
Filing 2
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 8/20/2024 at 10:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett. (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified. (ddb4)
|
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 189th Judicial District of Harris County, Texas, case number 2023-78359 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31719222) filed by Allstate Vehicle and Property Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Index, #2 Exhibit Docket Sheet, #3 Exhibit Combined State Court Documents, #4 Exhibit State Notice of Removal, #5 Exhibit Certificate of Interested Persons, #6 Exhibit Counsels of Record) (Owoeye, Brenda) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
