Steely v. Nabors Drilling Technology USA, Inc. et al
| Chrysalynn Steely |
| Canrig Drilling Technology Canada, LTD., Nabors Drilling Technology USA, Inc. and Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. |
| 4:2024cv02714 |
| July 22, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Lee H Rosenthal |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Chrysalynn Steely, filed. (Chester, Danielle) |
Filing 16
AGREED PROTECTIVE ORDER entered. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (lle4)
|
| Filing 15 Agreed PROPOSED ORDER (Agreed Protective Order), filed. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Cleary, James) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER on Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action.(Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) Parties notified. (lle4)
|
| Filing 13 Return of Service Unexecuted as to Nabors Drilling Technology USA, Inc. re: Complaint and Summons, filed. (Drinnon, Rodney) |
| Filing 12 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Canrig Drilling Technology Canada, LTD., Nabors Corporate Services, Inc., Nabors Drilling Technology USA, Inc., filed. (Cleary, James) |
| Filing 11 ANSWER to #1 Complaint by Canrig Drilling Technology Canada, LTD., Nabors Corporate Services, Inc., Nabors Drilling Technology USA, Inc., filed. (Cleary, James) |
| Filing 10 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Nabors Drilling Technology USA, Inc. served on 7/24/2024, answer due 8/14/2024, filed. (Drinnon, Rodney) |
| Filing 9 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Nabors Corporate Services, Inc. served on 7/24/2024, answer due 8/14/2024, filed. (Drinnon, Rodney) |
| Filing 8 RETURN of Service of SUMMONS Executed as to Canrig Drilling Technology Canada, LTD. served on 7/24/2024, answer due 8/14/2024, filed. (Drinnon, Rodney) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER Scheduling Rule 16 Conference With the Court and Setting Out the Requirements for Initial Pretrial Work. Initial Conference set for 10/25/2024 at 11:20 AM by video before Judge Lee H Rosenthal. (Signed by Judge Lee H Rosenthal) (Attachments: #1 Attachments) Parties notified. (bkt4)
|
| Filing 6 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bkt4) |
| Filing 5 Summons Issued as to All Defendants. Issued summons delivered to plaintiff by NEF, filed. (Attachments: #1 Summon, #2 Summon) (hl4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the referral judge's name will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bkt4) |
| Filing 4 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Canrig Drilling Technology Canada, LTD., filed. (Drinnon, Rodney) |
| Filing 3 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Nabors Corporate Services, Inc., filed. (Drinnon, Rodney) |
| Filing 2 Request for Issuance of Summons as to Nabors Drilling Technology USA, Inc., filed. (Drinnon, Rodney) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-31921603) filed by Chrysalynn Steely. (Drinnon, Rodney) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
