Gonzalez Obregon v. Romo
Plaintiff: Oscar Fernando Gonzalez Obregon
Defendant: Jorge Romo
Case Number: 4:2024cv03371
Filed: September 10, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Nature of Suit: Negotiable Instrument
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Federal Question: Enforcement of Judgment
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 10, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 10, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 165th District Court of Harris County, case number 2024-34294 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-32165343) filed by Jorge Romo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Exhibit, #4 Exhibit, #5 Exhibit) (San Miguel, Alan)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez Obregon v. Romo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jorge Romo
Represented By: Alan Ray San Miguel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Oscar Fernando Gonzalez Obregon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?