North v. Humble Police Department
Plaintiff: Julius Lamunn North
Defendant: City of Humble, Texas and Humble Police Department
Case Number: 4:2024cv03929
Filed: October 15, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Alfred H Bennett
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 5, 2024 Filing 9 MOTION for Judgment on the Pleadings Judgment by Humble Police Department, City of Humble, Texas, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Viada, Ramon)
December 4, 2024 Filing 8 RESPONSE to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment on the Pleadings, filed by Julius Lamunn North. (mmm4)
November 11, 2024 Filing 7 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by City of Humble, Texas, filed. (Viada, Ramon)
November 11, 2024 Filing 6 Amended Certificate of Service in a Removed Action by City of Humble, Texas, filed. (Viada, Ramon)
November 11, 2024 Filing 5 Certificate of Service in a Removed Action by City of Humble, Texas, filed. (Viada, Ramon)
October 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/9/2025 at 10:00 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Richard W Bennett) Parties notified. (bmn4)
October 17, 2024 Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bmn4)
October 17, 2024 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Richard W. Bennett randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bmn4)
October 15, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (bmn4)
October 15, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 334th District Court, case number 24-45882 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-32335936) filed by Humble Police Department. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Plaintiff's Original Petition, #2 Exhibit Citation, #3 Exhibit Defendant's Original Answer, #4 Exhibit State Court Docket Sheet, #5 Exhibit List of Parties & Counsel in State Court Action) (Viada, Ramon)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: North v. Humble Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of Humble, Texas
Represented By: Ramon G. Viada, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Humble Police Department
Represented By: Ramon G. Viada, III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Julius Lamunn North
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?