Laird v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company
| Martha Laird |
| Travelers Personal Insurance Company |
| 4:2024cv04000 |
| October 18, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Southern District of Texas |
| Alfred H Bennett |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER STAYING CASE granting #7 MOTION to Abate. This case is stayed and administratively closed for 120 days or until parties advise the Court that appraisal has been completed. Parties are ordered to file a status report with the Court regarding the appraisal process in 120 days. (Signed by Judge Alfred H Bennett) Parties notified. (glc4)
|
| Filing 7 MOTION to Abate by Martha Laird, filed. Motion Docket Date 12/26/2024. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order) (Dick, Eric) |
| Filing 6 First AMENDED COMPLAINT with Jury Demand against All Defendants filed by Martha Laird. (Dick, Eric) |
| Filing 5 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Martha Laird, filed. (Dick, Eric) |
|
Filing 4
ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 1/14/2025 at 10:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Christina A Bryan) Parties notified. (bmn4)
|
| Filing 3 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bmn4) |
| Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Christina A. Bryan randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bmn4) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Travelers Personal Insurance Company identifying The Standard Fire Insurance Company; Travelers Insurance Group Holdings, Inc.; Travelers Property Casualty Corp.; The Travelers Companies, Inc. as Corporate Parent, filed. (Catalano, Frank) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 458th Judicial District Fort Bend County, case number 24-DCV-320255 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ATXSDC-32353608) filed by Travelers Personal Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Catalano, Frank) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Laird v. Travelers Personal Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Travelers Personal Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | Frank J Catalano |
| Represented By: | Scott Allen Shanes |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Martha Laird | |
| Represented By: | Eric B. Dick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
