Calderon v. Brown et al
Plaintiff: Agustin Calderon
Defendant: Jeffrey Vincent Brown and Bobby Lumpkin
Case Number: 4:2024cv04122
Filed: October 25, 2024
Court: US District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Office: Houston Office
Presiding Judge: George C Hanks
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 FINAL JUDGMENT. Any claims for monetary damages are dismissed with prejudice to the claims being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. (Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (jm4)
November 26, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER granting #2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. The complaint (Dkt. 1) filed by Calderon is DISMISSED under 28 U.S.C.1915(e)(2)(B) and 28 U.S.C. 1915A(b) for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. His claims for injunctive relief are dismissed without prejudice. Any claims for monetary damages are dismissed with prejudice to his claims being asserted again until the Heck conditions are met. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED as moot. Email sent to Manager of Three Strikes List. Case terminated on November 26, 2024.(Signed by Judge George C Hanks, Jr) Parties notified. (jm4)
October 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 NOTICE to Pro Se Litigant of Case Opening. Party notified, filed. (cml4)
October 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (cml4)
October 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Agustin Calderon, filed. (cml4)
October 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 MOTION/APPLICATION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis by Agustin Calderon, filed. Motion Docket Date 11/15/2024. (cml4)
October 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 1 Prisoner Civil Rights COMPLAINT against All Defendants (Filing fee $ 405) filed by Agustin Calderon. (Attachments: #1 Letter) (cml4)
October 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Peter Bray randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (cml4)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Calderon v. Brown et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeffrey Vincent Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bobby Lumpkin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Agustin Calderon
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?