Ortuno et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Plaintiff: Cecilia Rodriguez and Marco Antonio Ortuno
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company and Union Pacific Corporation
Case Number: 4:2024cv05047
Filed: December 21, 2024
Court: U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas
Presiding Judge: Andrew S Hanen
Nature of Suit: Motor Vehicle
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Wrongful Death
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 27, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 27, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Case terminated on December 27, 2024 (Signed by Judge Andrew S Hanen) Parties notified. (jld4)
December 23, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Dismissal as to All Defendants by Cecilia Rodriguez, Marco Antonio Ortuno, filed. (Streich, Michael)
December 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER for Initial Pretrial and Scheduling Conference and Order to Disclose Interested Persons. Initial Conference set for 4/11/2025 at 09:30 AM by video before Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y Ho) Parties notified. (bmn4)
December 23, 2024 Filing 2 CLERKS NOTICE Regarding Consent to Jurisdiction of Magistrate Judge. Parties notified, filed. (bmn4)
December 23, 2024 Referral Judge Selected: Magistrate Judge Yvonne Y. Ho randomly selected to receive referrals. The selected Magistrate Judge is not assigned to this case until a District Judge refers the case or a motion or the parties consent to jurisdiction of the Magistrate Judge. Once a referral has been made, the name of the referral judge will appear at the top of the docket sheet. (bmn4)
December 21, 2024 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from 281st Judicial District, case number 202486017 (Filing fee $ 405 receipt number BTXSDC-32669617) filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company, Union Pacific Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit A-1, #3 Exhibit A-2, #4 Exhibit B) (Proctor, John)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Texas Southern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ortuno et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Cecilia Rodriguez
Represented By: Ryan Hamilton Zehl
Represented By: Mikhail J Paltiyevich
Represented By: Michael Edward Streich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Marco Antonio Ortuno
Represented By: Ryan Hamilton Zehl
Represented By: Mikhail J Paltiyevich
Represented By: Michael Edward Streich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company
Represented By: John William Proctor
Represented By: Kenneth M Hopkins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Union Pacific Corporation
Represented By: John William Proctor
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?